<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Rugers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287</link>
	<description>for Teachers and Students of the Pistol</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:39:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Stein</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3498</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3498</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, Ruger seems to be flailing around somewhat randomly to find both their identity and niche since the death of William Ruger.  With the Glock Homeland Defender program, or via membership in GSSF, the SR9 has no real-world price advantage over Glock-and is playing catch-up not helped by recalls (and subsequently adopting a clone of the Glock trigger-and always a significant portion of their internal mechanical architecture).

While I don&#039;t think that they&#039;re bad guns per se, I&#039;ve been totally underwhelmed by the P95, P345, and SR9.

Best, Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Ruger seems to be flailing around somewhat randomly to find both their identity and niche since the death of William Ruger.  With the Glock Homeland Defender program, or via membership in GSSF, the SR9 has no real-world price advantage over Glock-and is playing catch-up not helped by recalls (and subsequently adopting a clone of the Glock trigger-and always a significant portion of their internal mechanical architecture).</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t think that they&#8217;re bad guns per se, I&#8217;ve been totally underwhelmed by the P95, P345, and SR9.</p>
<p>Best, Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Engh</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3434</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Engh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3434</guid>
		<description>so how many recalls will this one have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so how many recalls will this one have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>Caleb - True...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caleb &#8211; True&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>Hey, it could be worse.  We could be talking about the &quot;exciting new guns from Taurus&quot;.  At least when your Ruger SR9 throws a part, Ruger gets the gun fixed and sent back to you in under 6 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it could be worse.  We could be talking about the &#8220;exciting new guns from Taurus&#8221;.  At least when your Ruger SR9 throws a part, Ruger gets the gun fixed and sent back to you in under 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>One of the Worlds Shortest Books:

&quot;Exciting Ruger Pistols&quot;

Yawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the Worlds Shortest Books:</p>
<p>&#8220;Exciting Ruger Pistols&#8221;</p>
<p>Yawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3429</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 06:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3429</guid>
		<description>I LOVE the Ruger GP100 and the P90. I don&#039;t care for 9mm too much so unless they&#039;ve released something new in 357m or 45acp I&#039;ll stay with the Rugers I&#039;m used to. I actually like the looks of the all black little SR9 compact though. Maybe Ruger could give us a 357m auto. I have noticed on some of the newer SP101s they are dropping Alex Sturm, it just says &quot;-Ruger-&quot; now no more Sturm. Anyone know why they&#039;re dropping his name from the brand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE the Ruger GP100 and the P90. I don&#8217;t care for 9mm too much so unless they&#8217;ve released something new in 357m or 45acp I&#8217;ll stay with the Rugers I&#8217;m used to. I actually like the looks of the all black little SR9 compact though. Maybe Ruger could give us a 357m auto. I have noticed on some of the newer SP101s they are dropping Alex Sturm, it just says &#8220;-Ruger-&#8221; now no more Sturm. Anyone know why they&#8217;re dropping his name from the brand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogre</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3428</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 06:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3428</guid>
		<description>Ruger Factory Recall for the SR9 Compact, in 3... 2...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruger Factory Recall for the SR9 Compact, in 3&#8230; 2&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P30man</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator>P30man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3426</guid>
		<description>jeeze the typos--time for bed... .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeeze the typos&#8211;time for bed&#8230; .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P30man</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>P30man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>Tried to like the SR9. Looks good on paper but rhe one I held in the store had poor finish ib nechanicals. Trigger felt awful but more importantly the mag release was insanely stiff and not in a comfortable position. If I can change mags relatively well then thats a deal breaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried to like the SR9. Looks good on paper but rhe one I held in the store had poor finish ib nechanicals. Trigger felt awful but more importantly the mag release was insanely stiff and not in a comfortable position. If I can change mags relatively well then thats a deal breaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gglass</title>
		<link>http://pistol-training.com/archives/2287/comment-page-1#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator>gglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pistol-training.com/?p=2287#comment-3423</guid>
		<description>I could not have said it better Todd. I was even excited about adding a companion to my LCP and LCR.

What really surprises me is that it does not seem like Ruger even tried to do a best in class as they have recently been known for. Example: The dimensions and weight are all larger than the M&amp;P9c, and there are quite a few who feel the M&amp;P compact is too large.

I would only add... Yawn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not have said it better Todd. I was even excited about adding a companion to my LCP and LCR.</p>
<p>What really surprises me is that it does not seem like Ruger even tried to do a best in class as they have recently been known for. Example: The dimensions and weight are all larger than the M&amp;P9c, and there are quite a few who feel the M&amp;P compact is too large.</p>
<p>I would only add&#8230; Yawn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

